cobraalerts

Thirty-six decided calls, 3 wins to 33 losses, ANTE Score 3 in a 3–22 interval, coverage 84% and not flagged partial. Average win +395%, average loss -87%, best +800%. With a hit rate of 8% those three winners do not come close to covering the 33 losses; the expectancy across the book is materially negative. Every settled call ran to expiry.

"SHORT SQUEEZE — $MG 22.5 call 10/16 at .30, added heavy." All 59 calls are options, typically priced between ten and forty cents. None state a target or a stop. Two chart posts in 310 tweets constitute the entire visible analysis; the thesis is asserted in the word "squeeze" and nothing further is offered for a reader to evaluate.

No stop, no target, all 36 settled calls carried to expiry, and the recurring instruction is to add heavily. Thirty-three of 36 lost, the worst at -99%. On contracts costing a dime, adding into weakness without an invalidation converts a small speculative position into a large one precisely when the thesis is failing. Nothing in the feed addresses sizing.

Of 310 tweets, 194 are calls and 31 promotion, the latter running a repeating "changing lives" challenge and rewards for post notifications. Updates advertise "$TRMD up 500%+" while the 33 losses go unmentioned. The same setups — including the identical strike and expiry — plus the same challenge wording appear on another account in this index, so a reader seeing both should not count them as independent confirmation.

No educational posts appear in 310 tweets. Squeeze mechanics, float dynamics and option pricing are invoked constantly but never explained, so a reader cannot evaluate a setup before committing money to it. Engagement is solicited through speed contests, follower rewards and giveaways, which makes the visible community response an unreliable signal about the quality of the calls themselves. There is nothing here designed to make a follower independent.

The measured record does not back following these alerts: three winners in thirty-six, no invalidation on any call, and no analysis attached. If long-shot options convexity is what you want, the better-documented accounts in this index publish their losses and at least state a fill and a plan. Check whether an apparently corroborating account is simply the same campaign.