Score audit
equivestr @equivestr
Every input is listed below — the score is the Wilson lower bound of the win rate over the decided calls, so anyone can recompute it. Methodology
Resolved calls (0)
0 wins + 0 losses = the decided base; 0 breakevens are resolved but carry no win/loss signal, so they sit outside it.
None yet.
Not adjudicable (1)
The platform declines to grade these: the price data available to us is coarser than the trade (spot FX and metals have no intraday feed, and a stop tighter than a daily bar cannot be adjudicated honestly), or the option contract has no bars. They are excluded from the score and from coverage entirely — not counted as losses.
“#optiontradeidea BUY #BSE 25 AUG 3700 CE AROUND 160 -- 170 SL 115, TARGET 250 & 300+ #breakoutstocks #nifty #banknifty”
Falsifiable, not yet decided (3)
Open or untriggered — these count against coverage until they resolve.
“#swingtrade BUY #URBANCO AROUND 130--131 SL 123 ON CLOSING BASIS TARGET 140 & 150+ #breakoutstocks #investing”
“Swing Trade Idea 📈 BUY #Kaynes 3300–3315 Stop Loss: ₹3130 (Closing Basis) Targets: 3560 & 3700+ Disclaimer : https://t.co/gryIRI7rAK #breakoutstocks #nifty #stockstowatch #brentoil https://t.co/wW8qRBRya6”
“🚨 Swing Trade Idea BUY: UTI AMC around 980 - 985 Stop Loss: 935 (Closing Basis) Targets: 1,040 & 1,070+ Disclaimer : https://t.co/oVwpSwZBlf #breakoutstocks #stockmarket #swingtrading”
No falsifiable level (0)
Calls with no stated target or stop can't be scored — they feed the unverified 1-Week Read instead and count against coverage. Not listed individually.
Call text is shown as captured at seed time; deleting the post on X does not remove it here. This audit is a record of public calls and their market outcomes — not financial advice, and never a recommendation. Dispute an attribution: claim this profile to correct it.