learnernoearner

Two hundred and ninety-two decided calls at a 24% hit rate — ANTE Score 20, Unproven, in a tight 20–30 interval. Coverage is 98% and not flagged partial, the highest here by a distance. Average win +15.3%, average loss -4.5%: winners run more than three times the losers, which is exactly how a trend follower survives losing three trades in four. The directional measure across 47 calls reads +8.3%.

"$WLD long, entry 0.431, target 0.46, stop 0.4195." Every element, every time — 96% of 300 calls carry both levels. Two hundred and ninety-six are crypto, spread across majors and mid-caps. He speaks in R-multiples rather than percentages, reports partial fills, and moves stops to break-even. The method is conventional and executed with unusual consistency.

Ninety-nine percent of calls state a stop and 207 of 294 settled calls closed on one — the stops are not decoration, they are the strategy. That is why the average loss is only -4.5% while the worst single call still reached -99.9% on a levered position. Risk per trade is small and bounded by design, and the losses are posted rather than quietly dropped.

Of 1,142 tweets, 144 are updates against 110 calls — a follow-through rate above one, meaning trades are more likely to be reported than announced. "Closing my short here at 81k. Was wrong on this one." Mornings open with a greeting to 126,000 followers and a heart emoji; promotion is eight posts in total. Occasional giveaways, no funnel, no highlight reel.

Only four posts classify as educational, yet the feed teaches the single hardest lesson in trading by demonstrating it three hundred times: a small stop, a bigger target, and the willingness to be wrong most of the time. A reader who tallied his calls for a month would understand R-multiples better than from most courses. Engagement is warm and steady.

You'll like this if you can stomach losing three trades in four for a positive expectancy, trade crypto swings, and want every call stated completely enough to grade yourself. You'll find it uncomfortable if a 24% hit rate reads as failure to you — on this payoff structure it is the design, not the defect. The 98% coverage means what you see is very nearly everything.