theprofinvestor

Based on 6 decided calls, 43% coverage, data through 2026-07-23, the verified spine is unforgiving: six resolved positions, six losses, no wins, averaging -18.17% each — with CRCL alone bleeding -47.46%. Across 14 directionally tracked calls the return sits at -1.7%. The sample is genuinely small and coverage under half, so read it as a snapshot, not a career verdict. Still, every closed trade here went against him, and the record is corroborated, not disputed.

The method is coherent: sector rotation first, then moving-average pullbacks — the 21EMA and 9EMA are his church — layered over seasonality and the presidential cycle. Plans lean conditional ('dips 53-57 = buys, keep stop at 45'), which is usable. But discipline is uneven: only 21% of calls pair a target with a stop, and 0% state a timeframe, so a follower often gets a level and a direction without an exit or a clock. Charts accompany most ideas.

Here's the crux. With no winning trades in the decided set, there's no average win to weigh losers against — the math can't yet show winners paying for losses. When a stop was written, it was largely honored: four of six exited on stop_hit. The damage came from the two that lacked one and timed out — CRCL ran to -47.46%, VIAV to -13.7%. So the pattern reads stop-when-stated, ride-when-not. Only 21% of calls carry both a target and a stop.

The voice is generous and relentlessly instructive — psychology, discipline, 'you slowly stop caring about being right.' It's also thick with victory laps: 'we called it,' 'June 9th was the bottom,' 'my job was to protect my people.' Some real humility surfaces too — he owns old bags and admits he 'quit 50 times' early on. No paid Discord or newsletter funnel appears in this corpus sample; monetisation, if any, isn't visible here. Follower base is about 125,000.

This is where he's strongest. A beginner would learn real scaffolding here: stage analysis, gap-fill mechanics, VIX buy-zones, moving-average retests, and why rotation matters more than any single ticker. He teaches openly rather than gatekeeping, and repeatedly credits process over prediction. He credits others occasionally too ('@TheLongInvest,' 'Burry nailed it'). The caution: the teaching is wrapped in a lot of self-referential 'I called it,' so learners should separate the durable frameworks from the running highlight reel.

You'll like this if you want a technical education — sector rotation, EMA discipline, market psychology — and you're happy to build your own entries and exits from the frameworks he lays out. You'll like it if a confident, high-volume voice motivates rather than grates. Skip it if you want a clean, auditable signal service: the verified sample is six-for-six red, timeframes go unstated, and roughly four in five calls lack a paired target and stop. Bring your own risk plan.